Sunday 31 December 2017

mindscape 2017

feverishly associating, mindmapping (15 seperate islands forming one continent in the end), in the process of graduating. looking for answers? but only acquiring more questions





a tad pretentious in hindsight, perhaps, but meaningful nonetheless








" as above, so below " ?

Thursday 29 June 2017

"Respire" + "Syndesia" (Semester 6)

After finishing the minor, we returned to St Joost and semester 6 started... Which was all about the "Small Stories in Silent Buildings" project. The "silent building" we would focus on was "De Mengfabriek" in Den Bosch.  A building with a lot of history and change of function throughout time. The research I did on this building resulted in an animation, but also an installation.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


The animation:

"Respire"

("to inhale and exhale air for the purpose of maintaining life; breathe.")

 



Here I combined 3d animation with 2d animated textures.

My whole concept focused on -the relationship- between the people, and the building itself.  And how we, the visitors and the companies inside the building, keep the building "alive", as if we were the building's oxygen. Without us the building would be an empty, lifeless shell. The function and use of the building has changed a lot throughout time, all because of the people who have come and gone.
But at the same time, the building benefits us too, as for some it's a place of income, therefore it keeps us "alive" as well.. I saw it as a symbiotic/mutualistic relationship. But also as a biological process that keeps an organism alive > respiration.

_______________________________________

Process
What I found interesting about the building is the fact that it's always changing (it's had different owners, different functions, and all kinds of people have come and gone) but the building, the outside, has basically stayed the same throughout its history... So continuous change (in- and efflux of people) within something that is constant (the building), was something I decided to delve deeper into.





I saw the building as a living organism. A body. Who needs the influx of people "to stay alive". Just like we need the influx of food/air/water to stay alive.



Here I was still thinking about literally portraying the building or not..

I decided not to. The building would be a human body.

 
(animation test)






-
Final illustrations I did:


Storyboard / Stills from the moving storyboard


and then it was animation time!



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


The installation:

"Syndesia"



Then the installation, which was actually a groupsproject! Based on the idea of "Symbiosis" and "Action -> Reaction" Me and my teammates created an organism, named "Syndesia" (derived from the word "syndesis". word origin; from Greek, from sundein to bind together, from syn- + dein to bind)

Syndesia is a spatial installation, using touch- and echo sensors, and projection mapping. She was exhibited at De Mengfabriek.

My role was mainly doing research and developing the concept and design of Syndesia. Then we all built her together.

Here are some of my sketches:


The whole idea behind her is that she's an organism (or the nervous system of a greater organism), who reacts to the public. The closer you get to her, the more intense her response. And when you touch her, her response is even greater. We wanted it to seem like she needed the audience to stay "alive".


Originally we wanted her ( the web / nervous system ) to fill an entire space (so it would be like the entire room was the organism, and you were inside of her body, directly interacting with her nervous system), but we had to keep the other group projects in mind, so we built our own frame.


Lastly...

A group picture, woo!! I really enjoyed working with this team! (Chantal van den Berg, Anouk Verhoeven, Marvin Dophemont and me :) )

____________________________________________________


So with that, my third year has come to a close. My minor was a while ago, but it taught me that everything can be a medium to tell a story, and I want to explore this more. Be it through animation, installations or something else!

Wednesday 15 February 2017

"Flux" - Minor project (Periode 9 + 10 / Semester 5)


The project I worked on the last 5 weeks of the minor.

Flux

What started as a research on the subject of identity, eventually became more about answering a very personal question: "Who am I (at this very moment)?" but also "What has formed my sense of I?" 
___________________

I didn't really know what I wanted to make when I started this project. Everything's a medium and can be used to tell a story I learnt during my minor. So did I want to make an animation? or not?.. I only knew that I wanted to research the subject of "identity" as I felt like my sense of I had changed in a really short amount of time, probably due to subjecting myself to quite a lot of new experiences, and meeting new people. I didn't feel like """the old me""" anymore. "Who am I?" and other questions arose. Basically I was having an identity crisis. I didn't know whether that was good or bad, but being aware that I was changing, and not knowing anymore where I was going, or where I wanted to go (and the anxiety that comes along with that) really drove this project.

So what made me feel like I was changing, in the first place? The outside world. Every setting we step into, every person we meet, has the potential to change and shape us in a profound way.

Based on that thought, I went onto the streets and let people draw/write on me what their unique characteristics are. As a metaphor for the environment that literally "shapes" me/us.

I wanted my friends to draw on me (as they obviously shaped me), but also strangers to see what meaningful experiences might arise from that. So I also did this in the city centre and other locations.

So I had all these clothes now and indeed, met a person on the street who I will not forget thanks to this little experiment.  But as happy as I was with all these drawings/writings I didn't have anything to go on to continue my research, except the extreme awareness I had, of how differently I behaved in each setting. Quite obvious, as we all play different roles depending on the setting/person.. but
 it really made me think which one of those 'roles' I play is the real me? is the authentic me? When am I most 'myself'?

so I did some research on Jung's "persona" and Winnicott's "false self" & "true self": "Winnicott used true self to describe a sense of self based on spontaneous authentic experience, and a feeling of being alive, having a real self." ...
So if the “true self” is a sense of self based on spontaneous authentic experience, I have to seek these kind of experiences out, right?

I found inspiration in the automatic writings of the Surrealists and decided to have "automatic dialogues" with people for my next experiment:
a one-to-one dialogue with different people, where we let our “subconscious” speak. I say one word, and someone else says another word right after that; speaking whatever comes to our minds without stopping to think first.
I was also curious to find out where my words (and the words of others) come from. As I was also extremely aware during this period that everything I say, is a collection of words I heard before from others. The way I speak, my mannerisms, are all a combination of the traits of people I have met/seen before. 

A friend of mine came with the suggestion to only film the eyes, so I did. And after looking at all the different dialogues I was struck by the eyes, and how they seem to look around and search continuously (for the right words to say?).

Then I put all the eyes together in one movie and the result struck me once more, the looking around fascinated me so much probably because I was also continuously looking around for “who I am” or "who I want to be", I guess.

I then did more research and stumbled onto Erik Erikson’s Psychosocial Stages of Development, and Marcia’s Identity Statuses. There was one stage of identity development that resonated with me:
 "Identity Moratorium – the status in which the adolescent is currently in a crisis, exploring various commitments and is ready to make choices, but has not made a commitment to these choices yet."

So I had found my focus points for my story:
-"Identity moratorium: The status of a person who is actively involved in exploring different identities but has not made a commitment."
- there is no final endpoint in identity development.
- and we’re shaped by our environment


So with these focus points, I did some visual research, how can I communicate this? I was visually really interested in “fragmentation”, and the taking on of many different forms. Continuous change. and I thought it would be good to try out projection mapping again as the way it can transform anything you project on, seemed suitable.




 
 
And then I beamed this looping animation onto a piece of paper which I had stuck to my wall. But it wasn't really telling a story...

---
So I did more experiments where I even used live footage of myself, but I didn't want to focus so much on myself in my work..





.....
and I missed the interaction I had with others during the early parts of my process. Plus I was curious how others feel about their identity, and if they are going through/or went through the same thing I’m going through at the moment.

So I decided to interview people and film them. (mainly classmates, and other people that I regularly interact with.) Some of the questions I asked:
- "How would you describe yourself",
- "How would you describe yourself when you were younger",
- "What caused you to change"

- etcetera.

  So I had all this footage, and now I just played around with it:
and experimented with what surface I could project on:

And what would I do with the audio?
Well, I had some really great conversations with the others, and some people told me things that really touched me and I could identify with... it was kind of like I was discovering myself again during the interviews... It made things clearer about who I was, am, and where I’m going. So I decided to answer the question of who I am by rearranging the audio in such a way that the others seemingly tell my story, of who I was/am and where I’m going. Who I am, and where I’m going will always (in a way) be influenced by the people around me, anyway. 

In the end I also simplified the visuals, as all the details were too distracting:

But projecting onto lifeless objects, felt lifeless. So I thought about projecting onto myself again, literally saying the words of others as a performance..:
..but the message I wanted to convey (how WE are ALL shaped by our environment, and continuously changing) didn't work this way (plus it was boring to look at/listen to) so...


The final work: 
Based on the interviews I did with people, I eventually projected the videoportrait(s) onto a mirror + let the audience listen to the interviews. When seated, the viewer would see their own face in the mirror, with the faces of others layered on top of their own.


exhibited at Breda's central train station
--

 

excerpt from Flux (full version is around 4 minutes)
        

The reason I named this project "Flux" is because the conclusion I came to, after this little research, is that (my) identity is fluid. Quite obvious of course, but when I was younger I had a fixed idea of who I was, who I am, and who I would become.(or who people told I was, am, and should/will become. To be more precise..) But our (sense of) self constantly changes as we move on in life and meet new people, and that's what I wanted to convey to others (and to myself) with this project.
And through this project I finally accepted that as a natural part of life, instead of fighting it, I suppose. So it's been a valuable experience.